Article on debate over the term ‘Anthropocene’
Everyday Futures team member Libby Robin has published a research paper in The Anthropocene Review, titled ‘Stratigraphy for the Renaissance: Questions of expertise for ‘the environment’ and ‘the Anthropocene” (written with her international collaborators, Paul Warde and Sverker Sörlin).
The article examines the short history of scientific decision-making and expertise in deliberations about the validity of the term ‘Anthropocene’ by the International Commission on Stratigraphy.
Contrary to fears that the Anthropocene debates constitute a politicisation of proper scientific practice, it argues that periodisation and categorisation in science (in stratigraphy, in this case) typically draws on expertise and information outside core disciplinary practice. When broad integrative concepts come into play, knowledge itself is reshaped. Disciplines and ‘non-scientific’ concerns develop new relations with each other. This is what happened in the Renaissance, when science itself emerged in its modern form.
Here parallels are drawn between the emergence of the concept ‘the environment’ in the postwar era and the 21st-century struggles over the idea of the Anthropocene. The politics of science creates uncertainties but equally nurture emergent possibilities for analysis that are not unlike the broad categories and periodisations – such as the Renaissance – in the humanities.